La Traviata
Teatro alla Scala – December 18, 2013
La Scala’s season opening production of La Traviata was
dripping with drama: Diana Damrau missed her entrance in the
Second Act, Piotr Bezcala declared he won’t ever sing again in Italy after the
hard core loggionisti booed him, director
Dmitri Tcherniakov and conductor Daniele Gatti were booed even more for
allegedly butchering Verdi’s masterpiece - and at La Scala, of all theaters!
I happened to be in Milan during the run of this production
and decided I simply had to see it to have an informed opinion on such a juicy
show (also, I have a soft spot for Željko Lučić). Getting tickets for La Scala
is no easy business, the box office sells out almost immediately and the black
market is full of dubious scalpers who will meet you in a dark alley and ask
600 Euros for a partial view ticket that may or may not actually let you into
the theater. So, the only way is the old school one of “knowing someone” and,
thank goodness, I did: a family friend with a season subscription very
gracefully let me go in his place.
La Scala’s public is definitely cockier and way more
ferocious that the Met’s. Before the show started, my neighbor was very
colorfully complaining that he heard Damrau was sick and was going to be
replaced by Irina Lungu and that was going to be a total “sòla” (“ripoff”). He was
evidently expressing the general sentiment, since when La Scala’s general
manager Stéphane Lissner made the relevant announcement on stage, he was
assailed by a chorus of boos and other insults (and if these days folks still
threw market vegetables to performers on stage am sure they would have tossed a
few tomatoes to the poor guy).
 |
| Photo Credit: Brescia & Amisano © Teatro alla Scala |
Also, when conductor Daniele
Gatti made his entrance and took his spot on the pit, someone in the
audience yelled “falla piu’ veloce
stasera!” (“make it faster tonight!”), voicing the widespread criticism
that Gatti chose an unusually slow tempo for this production. I will say that Gatti’s choice of tempi may have been academically respectful of Verdi’s 1854
revision for the Venice San Benedetto theater, but was indeed a bit all over the
place, some parts too slow (the first scene, not matching the party’s frenzy),
others way too quick (Germont’s aria “D’un
padre e d’una suora / t’affretta a consolar” – poor Lučić was struggling to
keep up).
 |
| Photo Credit: Brescia & Amisano © Teatro alla Scala |
The curtain opened the moment the orchestra started to play,
and during the overture Violetta stood in the middle of a big room with a few
fancy chairs scattered throughout, high ceilings with antique molding and a
Parisian-like balcony overlooking the street. She spent the overture in front
of a mirror, looking pretty ennuied
and fatigued while getting ready for her party, fixing her make-up and
adjusting her blue gown, silvery necklace and red flower in her hair, at times
with the help of a mature redhead Annina, who looked and behaved more like a retired
opera diva than a servant (and popped up throughout the opera when you least
expected her).
When the party erupts and Violetta’s guests arrive, the
decadent modern-day take was painfully evident, with the chorus wearing a
hodgepodge of trashy party dresses and behaving in line with their outfits. If
the direction’s aim was to depict Violetta’s party life as vane and shallow, it
was definitely successful, just not a pleasant sight. While the direction of
the duets with Alfredo worked pretty well, Dmitri
Tcherniakov chose to have Violetta perform her usually solitary arias “E’ strano! e' strano!” and “Follie,
delirio vano e’ questo!” while
drinking hard liquor and clunking glasses with a silent over-dressed and
over-jeweled Annina who thus emerges in a role of girlfriend-confidante who did
not add much and, rather, was unnecessarily distracting.
 |
| Photo Credit: Brescia & Amisano © Teatro alla Scala |
The country estate scenes were to me the most successful
direction-wise, with the couple having retired to the tranquility of the
countryside, they indulge in simple domestic pleasures, Alfredo rolling out home-made
pasta dough, Violetta (sporting comfy furry slippers) scolding him on the
proper way to do it while arranging market vegetables to be prepped on the
kitchen table. These moments were cute, heart-warming and real, just the way
the enjoyment of pure romantic love should be and also worked wonderfully well
with the music. It was also a nice touch having glimpses of Germont father
pacing back and forth outside of the kitchen window, as looming presence that
will ruin the idyllic romance. The only thing that did not work here was an odd
creepy rag doll sporting Violetta’s party outfit of the opening scene sitting on
the kitchen counter (why?) that Alfredo nurses and cuddles when he realizes
that his lover is gone. While I get what the director tried to accomplish here,
it was totally unnecessary and looked pretty awkward.
 |
| Photo Credit: Brescia & Amisano © Teatro alla Scala |
With the second act, we’re back to a trashy party, this time
allegedly in costume, though the only character really wearing one seems to be
Flora (with a ridiculous native American huge feathered headpiece), while the
rest of the attendees were maybe dressed up like distasteful party people if
that’s even a costume. Also, why on earth is Violetta wearing a small Afro wig?
And she takes it off at the end of the act? Outfits aside, I had a major
problem here with the chorus singing arias such as “Noi siamo zingarelle” and “Di
Madride noi siam mattadori” that are normally sung and danced by characters
looking and behaving like gypsies and matadors, just because that’s how they
dressed up for the party. Here they did not have any such costumes and their
sang words did not really match their acting as they just paced back and forth
nonsensically following poor Alfredo from one end of the stage to the other. Drastic
departures from the meaning of the libretto like these are pure heresy, no
excuses allowed. The “money-throwing” scene though was effective, with the bills
flying in the frame of the arched walls and the crowd in the background.
 |
| Photo Credit: Brescia & Amisano © Teatro alla Scala |
The final act was set back in Violetta’s apartment, this
time virtually empty, except for a mirror, two chairs, a tray of medicines, a
phone, a comforter, an ikea cardboard box full of pictures and again the odd
creepy Violetta-looking rag doll. The bare bones sets were successful in
conveying the fact that the poor woman sold everything (cannot even afford a
bed) and provided a perfect barren backdrop for the heart-wrenching arias
throughout the finale. A couple of things did not entirely work though: Alfredo
sings “Parigi o cara” while trying to
force Violetta to eat a cream puff (while I get he’s feeling awkward about the
whole situation, this was too much) and, most importantly, Violetta dies alone
on her chair, while Annina is disdainfully chasing away Alfredo and his dad, as
if to say “it’s all your fault now get out of here”. Call me romantic, but to
me Violetta must die in the arms of her loved one and leave him heart-broken.
Tcherniakov’s take was excessively nihilist in denying the unfortunate couple
even this final comfort, as if to say it’s too late, nothing can fix this
anymore.
 |
| Photo Credit: Brescia & Amisano © Teatro alla Scala |
Having said all that, if one has really good singers, sets
and direction become secondary. And La Scala had some pretty good ones. Piotr Beczala sounded fresh, confident
and with a full-bodied tone and, although he is warmer and more passionate when
he sings in Russian (think about his Lensky in the Met’s opening Onegin), his
Alfredo was convincing if a touch clueless at times, though that’s part of the
character.
Željko Lučić was,
as usual, magnificent with his signature sweet effortless power and musicality
that are just made for Verdi. His duets with Violetta were warm and tender,
expressing the quintessential Verdian father-daughter love, as Lučić always
does so masterfully in Rigoletto. I was curious to see whether his voice
sounded even stronger at La Scala than at the Met given the theater’s size
difference, but I will say that the Met’s acoustics are such that really
amplify it all, even more than a smaller space like La Scala.
 |
| Photo Credit: Brescia & Amisano © Teatro alla Scala |
But it was soprano Irina
Lungu who literally brought the whole house down, including my cynical skeptic neighbor who at the end was applauding like a madman and ecstatically
yelling brava, brava! While she was understandably tense at the
beginning given her last minute engagement, she loosened up towards the end of
the first act party scenes and grew stronger throughout the opera, delivering a truly terrific
performance in the third act, her “Addio,
del passato” making me weep like a baby. She movingly cried herself at
curtain call when the whole theater rose to salute her enthusiastically which,
coming from the ferocious La Scala’s public, was quite a sight.
All in all this production had some good and bad moments,
the modernizing efforts to keep La Traviata contemporary and real being
successful only a few times, with some unfortunate silly touches (that rag doll!).
The very core of the emotions at stake, however, was conveyed powerfully,
except maybe in the nihilist finale. It was brave of La Scala to commission
such a controversial production to open its season on the Verdi bicentenary –
there’s nothing like some good extra-curricular drama to stir the drama on
stage.
- Lei