Love is elsewhere, until it isn't. Photo credit: Ken Howard
From the very beginning, with its in medias res amorphous
opening, the uncanny score of Kaija Saariaho’s L’Amour de Loin throws
you into a dream-like universe. Lush and atmospheric, the Finnish composer’s
music suspends the listener over an indistinct watery expanse. Eschewing an
overture or prelude of any kind, the first bars conjure a brine-laden formless
and foggy seascape that only slowly comes into focus the way distance lies out
over the ocean.
Susanna Mälkki conducted an
exceedingly smooth reading of this uncanny score with the utmost polish.
Interestingly, in recordings with other conductors the same score seems more
flush with jolting surprises from jarring horns and more pronounced cacophony
from the percussion. The mood created by Ms. Mälkkiwas more suggestive,
more oneiric. It came off to my ear more of a dreamy Debussy dream (à la Pelleas
et Melisande), with some of the quirkier Messiaen eccentricities that
punctuate its aural landscape toned down and mellowed out.
Bands of light imitate the sea. Photo credit: Ken Howard
Director Robert Lepage’s luminous production provided a
fitting counterpoint to the mellifluous score. Lepage and his team focused on
the ineluctable and seemingly insuperable obstacles that separate us from one
another in any relationship; the daunting gulf that so often divides two people
and impedes connection. The staging at the Met was dominated by some two-dozen
bands of light that represented the central figure of the sea in the story over
which he suspended a mobile crane that could become a stairway with a platform
on either end. The effect of the bands of light was hypnotic, particularly when
they were made to fluctuate, rise and fall, imitating at one point the
movements of a gentle yet unsettling storm at sea. But like many of this
visionary director’s productions this one was kind of a one trick pony, which
in this case was not entirely off base. It matched the spectral, minimalist
nature of the music, and it heightened the dreaminess of certain moments in the
story, especially when Rudel dreams and the idealized object of his affections
(played by a dancer) materializes over the bands of light, diving through the
waves in a dolphin-like fashion.
Also effective was the way the chorus was deployed. Strategically
placed beneath the “water” toward the back of the stage, where they could only
just barely be seen allowed them to lend their voices to the majestic and
almost mystical heightening of the singers’ voices throughout the opera. It
created a haunting and often imperceptible embellishment of the sound of the
individual singers and an almost spiritual elevation of the emotions. Less
compelling was the peek-a-boo choreographies they were made to do, poking their
heads up over the “surface” of the water in certain nightmarish moments.
The chorus makes its presence known. Photo credit: Sarah Krulwich
Based on a very brief romanticized account of the life of the
Provençal troubadour Jaufré Rudel, the plot of L’Amour de Loin can be
summarized as follows: a prince is bored with his womanizing life and decides
to devote his energies to love more deeply; a pilgrim passing by tells him
about this incredibly beautiful woman who lives across the sea in enemy
territory; prince gets very excited about the idea and starts singing lovely
poetry about the woman as the perfect idea of love; pilgrim tells the woman
about all the fuss she’s created overseas and she’s not sure how to take it;
prince decides to make the trip across the sea to finally meet the object of
his desire but when he gets there he dies from the hardships of sea travel;
woman finally sees the love and gets all combative about the whole ordeal.
A lyric lady of love breaks through to the other side. Photo credit: Met Opera
This is an opera composed by a woman about a man looking at a
woman who in turn finally gets her voice in the act of looking back at that
man. Despite the seemingly traditional underpinnings of the romantic story
itself, the triangulation of these various gazes, nevertheless, packs a radical
punch.
Scores of lyric ladies have appeared over the millennia in the
amorous and elegiac poetic tradition from Catullus, Propertius and Ovid to the
troubadours, Dante and the centuries of Petrarchists who continue to write
right down to our own time. In the history of this patriarchal literary trope,
rarely are the female objects of these poets’ affections ever afforded the
agency of speaking for themselves, seldom are they granted a voice of their
own.
If you read the libretto divorced of the score and its staging,
you come away with the impression that Clémence is quick to respond to her
suitor’s advances in kind. But the way the end of both Act II and Act III were
staged by LePage show that something slightly deeper may going on here.
Clémence steps down from her pedestal. Photo credit: Ken Howard
The most powerful of these moments occurs at the end of Act III.
Throwing a mini-conniption fit, Clémence steps down off the pedestal, on which
even the director has placed her, thus breaking the illusion of the show, and
stands between two of the bands of light, in the middle of the “water,” as
though the make-believe were over and it was no longer “water.” She is indeed
brazenly standing up and making herself heard as a living woman and not an
idealization. She defiantly no longer wants to play the game of representation
and fantasy anymore. If she has a say in the matter, she isn’t going to allow
herself to be loved in an idealistic way by someone who has never even met her.
In this take, Clémence transcends her status as passive object of desire. For a
fleeting moment in the story, she’s not going to humor a distant love like
this. She is a human being just like he is and thus wants a love that is human.
In the role of the lover from afar, Jaufré Rudel, was
bass-baritone, Eric Owens, from whose booming imperious voice I expected
more. He left me feeling a little lukewarm. Other singers that I have heard in
this role have imbued the character with a slightly more irascible, angrier
reaching quality that makes the desire of the poor bereft troubadour soar a
little more. Owens sounded more resigned in the chesty depths of his longing,
coming across as a lover who is more languidly lethargic than energetic in his
desire.
The messenger scene. Photo credit: Ken Howard
Beset not only by the obstacle of the sea, the two lovers in this
opera, which is set in the eleventh century against the backdrop of a holy war,
are positioned on opposite sides of enemy lines. The figure of the Pilgrim,
here sung by mezzo-soprano Tamara Mumford, is deployed as a conduit for
the lyricism of the troubadour to pass from one character to the next. The
flights of poetic inspiration with which the opera opens belong to Jaufré. He
sends his lyrical spirit along via the Pilgrim who has been charged with the
task of embodying those inspired verses for his beloved which then in turn
inspire her to embark on flights of lyric fancy of her own.
Like Sancho Panza in an analogous messenger scene in Cervantes’ Don
Quixote, the Pilgrim rather humorously forgets most of the content of the
poetic missive from Jaufré to Clémence. He manages to transmit nothing more
than the gist of the message after garbling the end of the song he was sent to
sing on behalf of his master. It is a light-hearted moment in an otherwise
rather stolid evening at the opera. Fortunately Mumford didn’t ham it up but
rather she played the humor with subtlety and tact. She pushed the ethereal
sound of her instrument throughout. And equally used her mezzo to soar on
amorous pinions in ways that Eric Owens’ instrument simply did not, at least
the evening that we heard him. Interestingly, the Pilgrim’s arias are the only
portions of the opera that sound like they belong to the era the plot is set
in, with a style reminiscent of medieval madrigals.
Don't shoot the messenger Photo credit: Ken Howard
Soprano Susanna Phillips, in the role of Clémence, was
simply stunning. She embodied the tricky tempos and other idiosyncrasies of the
score beautifully and she nailed all the soaring high notes that gave angelic
wings to her unattainable beauty. Phillips made the show, as both the empowered
woman with a say in things and the impressionable young pushover that this
character’s duality encompasses. Because, of course, by the end she does indeed
eventually embody the cardinal virtue suggested by her symbolic name.
The poet sets out to cross the sea. Photo credit: Sarah Krulwich
Once Jaufré musters the wherewithal to cross the sea, the journey
takes its toll on him. He arrives only to collapse at the feet of his beloved
and rather anticlimactically dies in her arms. There is nothing particularly
moving about this sudden and almost mechanical turn of events. Instead, the
climax is saved for Clémence’s response to what she is forced to endure. Seeing
that God has struck down a man so good and so sincere in his love, she lashes
out in frustration at the injustice underlying God’s moral universe.
The lovers briefly meet across the chasm. Photo credit: Ken Howard
The outcome of this brief but profound long-distance romance leads
her to take up another call to arms. This time Clémence turns to another
“lover,” one who rather ambiguously is either God himself or the deified spirit
of her lost lover. To remedy one distant love she turns to another even more
impossibly distant love. Depending on how you take this spiritual turn in the
story, the end of the opera either undermines or reinforces the notion that
there is something about true love is always only ever elsewhere.
And this is where L’Amour de Loin, while it may be set in
the middle ages, is the product of a more modern and intellectual, almost
aseptic, sensibility. This is not an opera that unleashes emotions or visceral
reactions of any sort. The dramatic tension is somehow there, yet it does not
explode in any traditional way. There is a lot of exploration of ideas
about love, but the story as told by the music never gets to your heart.
No comments:
Post a Comment