Showing posts with label Alexander Lewis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alexander Lewis. Show all posts

Monday, November 6, 2017

Men on the Verge

Matthew Aucoin’s Crossing
BAM Next Wave Festival
Howard Gilman Opera House
October 5, 2017

The lightning rod of a community of fallen soldiers as consummate optimist
Photo credit: Gretjen Helene
Walt Whitman somehow always manages to remain pertinent. He comes up even when you least expect it. Not only did he make a prominent cameo in Ben Lerner’s last novel 10:04, for example, but a lost novel by the poet the himself also recently emerged from the archives and has had us abuzz again about this most American of wordsmiths. We just can’t stop talking about him. The prodigiously talented young composer Matthew Aucoin’s magisterial opera, Crossing, lends us yet another opportunity to reassess the omnipresence of this seemingly measureless American figure.

Aucoin draws on the omnivorous diaries Whitman kept during his volunteer years as a nurse in the Civil War and published under the title Memoranda During the War. In a stroke of genius, a figure found therein named John Wormley gets a fictionalized treatment; or rather he becomes a pivotal plot device in the opera. He is the one who gives the story its main thrust and its primary sense of drama.

The poet finds himself in a cold, dark wood, lost to himself
Photo credit: Gretjen Helene
The opera begins with an elderly, grey-bearded Whitman paraphrasing Dante in the throes of a midlife crisis: “In the middle of the journey of my life, / I found myself a self I didn’t know.” When the show opens most of the stage is walled off. Our hero is hedged in, blocked from life. He is surrounded by projected images of an unsettling dark forest scene consisting of the chiaroscuro shadows of gnarled leafless trees, animated by a jittery moving camera, which sets the tone for the poet’s Dantesque moment of existential doubt.

The man who would never be the same again
Photo credit: Steven Pisano
Much of what Aucoin has set out to dramatize is the effect that the war had on Whitman’s creative spirit. The standard narrative of his career casts the Civil War as a turning point. It’s not that he stopped writing in the aftermath, but he never wrote again with quite the same verve. It’s almost like a part of him died along with the country’s innocence. Which is maybe what makes the story told here, not only timeless, but utterly timely for the world we inhabit today, perhaps even more so today than in the pre-Trump era when it was written.

We open on an iconically bearded, avuncular Whitman who expresses his uncertainty about who he really is: “Known to the world as Everyman, / I did not know who I was.” He is no longer content embodying the persona he painstakingly constructed in his antebellum poetry, that of the Everyman who “contains multitudes.” The very foundation of his claim to fame, the core of his poetic and largely public identity, is in question.

What is it, then, between us?
Photo credit: Steven Pisano
“What is it, then, between us?” he ponders. A line from Crossing Brooklyn Ferry is the first big quote to make a cameo from Leaves of Grass. It provides a sort of thesis statement for the night. What is the nature of the boundaries and borders that separate us. What does it take to breach them? What is it about our shared humanity that unites us despite the illusion of autonomy that limits and distances us from one another, as individuals and as a nation?

At this point the partition that closed off much of the stage is removed, revealing the Civil War hospital where Whitman served as a nurse during the waning years of the conflict. He came to check on his wounded brother, which is what brought him there, he recounts, but he continues to stay and doesn’t know why. He must be looking for something, he muses.

The poet as designated caregiver
Photo credit: Gretjen Helene
His role at the hospital is an almost maternal. Whitman is not a trained medic but he is the sole designated caregiver. The opera is basically a portrait of this larger than life man. His most oversized characteristic is consummate optimism. He is always there to cheer the men up, especially when a particularly gloomy pessimistic adversary stumbles into the ward and is, quite literally, on a mission to lay everybody’s spirits low.

Enter John Wormley, a minor figure who makes a cameo appearance in Whitman’s wartime diaries and around which Aucoin has constructed a fictionalized drama and love story. As it turns out Wormley’s mission is even more insidious than merely raining on their already glum parade. He is a mole, a confederate soldier in disguise who wants to leak information about the camp hospital back to his rebel comrades.

Enter Wormley, the negative to Whitman's purely positive valence
Photo credit: Gretjen Helene
The tug of war between Whitman’s relentlessly positive outlook and Wormley’s dismally negative one continues over the next several tableau that constitute the body of the opera, until a relationship of some sort comes suddenly, and rather shockingly, to fruition, despite the sketchy outlines we are given. It is eventually also “consummated,” I suppose, in a scene that concludes with the two men fully clothed and spooning on one of the beds in the crowded group barracks.

From bedside to bedside we go
Photo credit: Richard Termine
The moment is the opera’s imagined climax of a scene that takes its cues from the striking poem entitled The Sleepers: “I go from bedside to bedside, I sleep close with the other sleepers each in turn, / I dream in my dream all the dreams of the other dreamers, / And I become the other dreamers.” Whitman’s uncanny aptitude for containing multitudes turns voyeuristic in a sexually suggestive kind of way. “I roll myself upon you as upon a bed, I resign myself to the dusk,” Whitman says at one point in the poem that Aucoin brings to life on the stage, bestowing upon his confused characters the fulfillment they crave, whether they acknowledge the craving or not.

Love in the time of war knows no boundaries
Photo credit: Gretjen Helene
Because the heightening of their intimacy only gets superficial treatment at best, we don’t quite believe Whitman, in an otherwise tender and moving moment, when he professes his love for the dying traitor, whom he cradles in his arms later in the opera: “Oh my son, / I never loved another / Till you.” The quintessential Whitmanesque sentiment of exalting the universal in the particular and vice versa is nevertheless clear. It is the sentiment we find upon the introduction of Wormley. Uncle Walt’s embrace of every man in his inclusive utterance: “I am with you,” sums up his beautiful gesture of friendship and acceptance. Dramatically, however, I was not particularly convinced that the emotional finale of the opera in this penultimate scene hits its mark, despite the fact that musically it was incredibly effective.

More intellectually than emotionally stirring is Wormley’s sudden Whitmanesque epiphany about the earth’s welcome and release of his marching feet when he felt that he was every soldier in the lead up to his passing in the arms of his lover. Having won out in the end, Whitman’s positive outlook seems to have sent the troubled young pessimist into a conniption fit of appreciation for life in all its minuscule nuances. It is a stunning moment in the score.

Wormley sees the Whitmanesque light in a beatific vision of his own
Photo credit: Gretjen Helene 
On every other count, however, it would seem that Wormley gets the least exciting writing both musically and otherwise to sing. In a subtle ploy used by the composer, once Wormley reveals his true identity (after posing as a Yankee soldier), his voice intentionally alters to reveal distinctively southern cadences. It is a minor detail in the grand scheme of the texture of the opera, which is why it hardly makes up for the fact that so much of the rest of Wormley’s role is otherwise relatively bland.

Tenor Alexander Lewis played John Wormley as a bedraggled soldier, a wounded vagrant with nothing to live for. Baritone Rod Gilfry leant his embodiment of Walt Whitman a wise world-weariness.

Freddie Stowers goes into a mystic trance
Photo credit: Steven Pisano
The greatest highlight musically and the most thrilling and inventive writing of the night went to Freddie Stowers, the fugitive slave who had fled to the north on foot in search of his freedom only to march back to the south as a soldier to fight for the freedom of others. The ineffably velvet-toned bass-baritone Davóne Tines sang the role, which was composed explicitly for him. His instrument is perfectly suited to the hybrid sounds that Aucoin wrote for Stowers.

In his one big aria, just before the Sleepers segment, Tines breaks into soaring story mode. He recounts a delirious vision he had when he escaped to the north and claims to have glimpsed in his fever dream the “future of humankind on the earth.” His otherworldly ecstasy has him singing in soulful southern spiritual cadences.

The herald arrives with a message of hope
Photo credit: Gretjen Helene
This is the kind of thing that I personally look for in a contemporary opera: the crossing of musical boundaries beyond traditional operatic vocal expression. Depending on the story being told, composers today have a whole universe of other traditions to draw upon in order to cross pollinate and fruitfully contaminate their scores. Stowers’ old-timey spiritual was one of these moments to savor.

In a world of male nurses and female messengers, soprano Jennifer Zetlan sang the golden bearer of good news – the token female role – with sunshine in her hair. At a particularly tense moment in the plot, Zetlan bounded into the hospital in a pastoral cotton dress with bright locks of buoyant brunette curls tousled on her head, fresh as a daisy, relatively speaking, as though she wandered out of an episode of Little House on the Prairie.

Not only does Zetlan provide our only glimpse of a world outside the misery of the war and the wasteland it leaves in its wake, but she is the only woman in an otherwise purely male, homosocial world. Her arrival ignites Wormley’s fear. Would she reveal the true identity of the treacherous guest? No! She comes in triumph, with news that the war is over. The rebels have been defeated and the union of country remains strong.

The men are spent come war's end
Photo credit: Gretjen Helene
If that sounds like cause to celebrate you’d be wrong. All of the poor wounded men feel used, spent like money to win the war. It is a dismal climax, no matter that we’re on the winning side. It seems to serve as a commentary that there are no winners in war, which would echo great classic war epics like Homer’s Iliad. Instead of exulting in the victory of the Union forces, the hospital is torn down and everybody saunters off with their wounded bodies and their tattered pride.

The world according to Whitman
Photo credit: Gretjen Helene
Whitman’s prose in the Memoranda is an exciting kaleidoscope through which the writer filters everything he experiences, witnesses, thinks, feels, observes, contemplates. It reads like a diary though – a fragmentary day-by-day, blow-by-blow account of a life lived in the moment. I wasn’t sure how the libretto would manage to turn it into something with a narrative.

Instead, the inspiration driving the opera forward is admirable and feels more pertinent to the American experience than ever before. The conceptual crossings that it addresses are many: between two individuals; across enemy lines; from wartime to its aftermath; between life and death.

But what kind of world does Aucoin create musically? The repetitive minimalism of Philip Glass most certainly makes a cameo appearance or two over the course of the opera and it was most effectively used to capture Whitman’s signature cosmic curiosity. For a writer who loved Donizetti, Rossini and Verdi, is this the way we are to understand Whitman would have heard the music of the world? I’m not sure that’s necessarily the case. But it was nevertheless a uniquely well-rounded and profoundly human experiment in modern opera.

– Lui

 
Memoranda during the war
Photo credit: Gretjen Helene

The post-war period is an even greater wasteland than before
Photo credit: Gretjen Helene

Thursday, December 19, 2013

You're Irresistible, Baby!

The Met’s Las Vegas Rigoletto
November 30, 2013

Photo credit: Ken Howard / Met Opera
We're in Las Vegas, circa 1960. “The Duke” is a Sinatra-like singer and the powerful owner of a casino where vice, money and decadent entertainment abound. He’s also a serial womanizer who can never get enough of the ladies. In fact, his entourage of suave men in shiny tuxedos often procures fresh prey for him. The hunchback Rigoletto is a comic who works for the Duke and is always poking fun at everyone, often pushing jokes too far. Enter a wealthy Arab sheik that Rigoletto needles obscenely as a cover to the Duke's recent conquest of his daughter. The humiliated sheik explodes in a rage and curses both the Duke and his comic. In a city where luck and superstition rule, a “maledizione” is serious stuff.

Photo credit: Ken Howard / Met Opera
Rigoletto gets off his comic shift and goes home to his only family, his beloved daughter Gilda – a beautiful pious young thing he keeps locked up at home at all times (except to go to Sunday mass). He is too afraid the vicious men of the town may corrupt his good little girl. Bad luck has it that somehow the Duke managed to lay eyes on sweet, chaste Gilda and decides he wants her. This time his trick will be to play the part of a lovey-dovey penniless student, which works pretty well. Gilda falls romantically head over heels for the “student” who also seems totally taken though that, too, could just be another womanizing strategy.

The Duke’s entourage decides to play a prank on Rigoletto and, thinking that Gilda is his lover, they abduct her and bring her to the Duke for his entertainment. The Duke deflowers Gilda at lightening speed and immediately thereafter loses interest. When Rigoletto discovers what happened to his innocent daughter he is rage-crazed and swears to avenge her honor. His bloody vengeance involves a hired (but honest) assassin and his slutty sister and it may or not go as planned...

Photo credit: Ken Howard / Met Opera
Does this sound like an 1851 opera? Or more like a modern mob movie? The Met showed us that time and place hardly matter as this story could be set in 16th century Mantua or 1960s Las Vegas and work equally well. Either way, it’s rife with dramatic tension, fiercely passionate Verdi music and some of the most beautiful singing.

It was a thrill to see the Met’s 2012 Las Vegas Rigoletto again. The singers in last year’s inaugural cast for the debut of this new production were so spectacular that it hardly mattered where they set it. Revisiting it again this year with a new cast and Pablo Heras-Casado conducting, we stand by the conviction that this modernized production works. The sets are dynamic and elaborate and the story is only made more vivid than if they had kept it in sixteenth-century Mantua with men in tights and puffy sleeves.

This time we decided to follow the Met English subtitles throughout the opera. And not out of necessity (being Italian speakers and knowing Rigoletto by heart) but rather because we heard that subtitles, too, were innovated by this production. The Met pushed its modernizing efforts to the point of revising the traditional English translation of the Italian libretto to jazz it up with 1960s Vegas slang. Updating the subtitles to match the era in which the opera is set is sure blasphemy to purists and really a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it can engage the non-Italian speaking audience in livelier ways than a verbatim translation of 19th-century poetic language, which is admirable. On the other hand, however, it may be distracting and fall into the trap of going too far and radically changing the sense of the original, which is, indeed, a mortal sin even by our standards.

The Met did not fall into such trap and offered a refreshingly updated and often clever translation by Michael Panayos and Paul Cremo, without ever departing from the original core meaning but rather just massaging the text with glittery period touches that most times worked pretty well. Here’s an example:
Photo credit: Ken Howard / Met Opera

Original Libretto:

DUCA
Ma dee luminoso
In corte tal astro qual sole brillare.
Per voi qui ciascuno dovrà palpitare.
Per voi già possente la fiamma d'amore
Inebria, conquide, distrugge il mio core.
CONTESSA
Calmatevi …

Traditional Translation:

DUKE
So bright a star should be shedding
Photo credit: Ken Howard / Met Opera
its brilliance on my court.
You would make every heart beat faster here.
The fires of passion already flare
headily, conquering, consuming my heart.
COUNTESS
Calm yourself!

“Rat Pack” Translation:

DUKE
Your movie-star looks
really light up the place
Photo credit: Ken Howard / Met Opera
Every heart in this club
should be beating for you
You’re irresistible, baby
you make me burn with love
you send me to the moon!
COUNTESS
Take it easy, fella!


The “astro,” or star, metaphor carries over into a reference to movie starlets, and the Duke’s court is appropriately reconfigured as a club, while the Petrarchan language of the consuming fires of love translate directly into hepcat talk. It’s colorful and clever and almost even more successfully poetic with respect to the otherwise rather bland conventional English translation also presented here. After all, the Duke’s character is the kind of superficial lady’s man who would have come up with zingers like: “Come on, baby, let’s give it a whirl!


When it comes to narrative strategies, Michael Mayer’s production not only remains true to the core of the original opera but also adds several touches that flesh out better the characters. The Duke’s is one of the characterizations that benefited most from the Vegas take. In classic productions, when in Act II he is sad because he thinks Gilda has been kidnapped and he starts going all mushy about she being “the one,” it is always a bit hard to believe since the Duke is supposed to be a chauvinist womanizer. This production has him do lines of cocaine and drink hard liquor while he sings these arias, thus suggesting, in line with the core of the character, that the Duke was just babbling under the effects of hard drugs and stiff alcohol, and, no matter how convinced he sounds in his singing, his convictions are as steadfast as a feather in the wind. Later, in Act III this Sinatra-like Duke sings the famous misogynistic aria “La donna e’ mobile / qual piuma al vento” while twirling around the pole of a strip club, making it clear (in case there was any doubt) that he’s the fickle one, not women.




Photo credit: Ken Howard / Met Opera

Another stroke of genius is the Rat Pack transformation of the Duke’s entourage that perfectly reflects the goliardic spirit of the courtiers, and very entertainingly so. Their chorus scenes are extremely vivid and effective, with a group of men in shiny multi-color tuxedos and a lot of hair gel gallivanting around in grand early-1960s cinematic style, all while singing Verdi. The three main Rat Pack characters, Borsa (Alexander Lewis), Marullo (Jeff Mattsey) and Count Ceprano (David Crawford) were definitely more fleshed out here than in other productions. Inspired by the likes of Sammy Davis, Jr., Dean Martin and Sam Giancana, they evidently had a lot of fun with their roles and they were a pleasure to watch with their shenanigans, especially during some of the musical interludes.

This production at times even improves the narrative when compared to a more traditional setting. In fact, in Act II classic productions always struggle with a weak plot point when Rigoletto cannot hear the courtiers kidnapping his screaming daughter while he holds a ladder because he has a mask over his eyes (that allegedly also covers his ears?!?). Mayer cleverly solves the problem by sending Rigoletto “upstairs” in an elevator so that he’s not physically there when the actual kidnapping occurs and his failure to notice is thus made credible.

Photo credit: Ken Howard / Met Opera
Željko Lučić was just so spectacular last year that it was going to be a tall order for Dmitri Horostovsky to match his predecessor’s performance in the eponymous role. With his action movie star good looks, Dmitri is not your typical Rigoletto. And boy did they do a number on him in make-up! His transformation from “barihunk” into old hunchback with paunch and a few strands of white hair combed across an almost bald scalp was terrific, particularly since the proud shaking of his flowing silver mane is one of Dmitri's signature moves in virtually every other role he performs. Also, one would think that both his haughty acting and fierce singing style generally better suit a sexy villain rather than the hunch-backed, pathos-invoking paterfamilias at the center of Verdi’s Rigoletto.


Photo credit: Ruby Washington / The New York Times
Dmitri’s acting was intensely accurate and generally successful in getting into character, showing a range that we rarely see from him. In the first scene he was hamming it up with the lounge dancers and twisting his hips like Elvis as he taunted the sheik, rendering the comic side of Rigoletto very energetic when compared to traditional settings. Horostovsky was a fairly convincing tender father in his duets with Gilda, however his best stage presence (not surprisingly) was in the raging bits, so much that in “Cortigiani, vil razza dannata,” he was a bit too busy forcefully acting and running from one courtier to the other, affecting a bit the intensity of his singing. While Dmitri’s angry-edged baritone sounded on the snarling end at times, he consistently delivered deep dark tones with hints of a smooth sweetness that made for a vocally charismatic Rigoletto. The evening we saw him, his voice felt unusually restrained in the first act, but when he loosened up he was sensational. His duets with Gilda were as lovely and heart wrenching as ever, “Fanciulla piangi” making the fanciulla of us cry copiously and Dmitri’s vocal performance in the third act ranged from vengeful to deeply dramatic to desperately defeated, just the way we like a Rigoletto.


Photo credit: Ken Howard / Met Opera
But it was the young soprano, Sonya Yoncheva, who stole the show while stepping in to replace Aleksandra Kurzak (pregnant with tenor Roberto Alagna’s child). Yoncheva sang consistently stronger than anybody else on stage, outshining even all of the seasoned Met veterans in this cast, including both Horostovsky and Polenzani. The piercing purity of her voice streamed effortlessly from her petite frame. With her frail yet powerful lyricism and her charming presence, Yoncheva dominated her scenes gracefully and tragically. Fresh faced and youthful, she really looked the part and embodied all the vulnerability of the poor tragic naïve Gilda. Yoncheva did not win Placido Domingo’s Operalia competition in 2010 for nothing – definitely a singer to keep an eye on.

Matthew Polenzani is growing on us, while we were not convinced by his Nemorino in 2012, we enjoyed him in Maria Stuarda and Così and really appreciated him as the Duke. He delivered clean, fresh sound, clear articulation, on point tempo and musicality, and great Sinatra-like acting. On the whole, he is highly likeable, but he still does not stir the deep turmoil that a world-class Italian-style tenor should be capable of. We find Polenzani to be often too high pitched; lacking a certain manly depth, with his voice still sounding almost too young, remaining too firmly on the surface.  

Photo credit: Ken Howard / Met Opera
Slovak bass Stefan Kocán always exudes charisma with commanding stage presence and his Sparafucile was no exception. While we've seen and loved him before in the role, this time his acting got even better, portraying the honest villain (he may be a hired assassin but he's not a thief!) with the sleek confidence of a film noir actor. Vocally, Kocán has a deep, rich and smooth tone that somehow comes as a surprise from such a young singer and is always a pleasure to hear. We wish there were more extensive bass roles around so that we could get more Kocán –looking forward to seeing him as Konchak in Prince Igor in February!

A lot has been said about the spectacular sets of this production, for which no detail was small enough, from the diverse use of the “neon vocabulary” throughout the three acts, to the wink-wink references to the Met’s own decorative elements (gates, chandeliers, curtains), to the Nevada license plate of Sparafucile’s car ("SPARFUC"). We can only let the pictures speak for themselves and salute the Met’s set design team for the terrific effort.

Photo credit: Ken Howard / Met Opera
This production is to us the perfect example of a clever new take on a classic and thus a must see for virtually everybody: it may entertainingly lure opera-virgins into the art form, convert the traditionalist to modernizations of classic repertoire and refresh Rigoletto for those who know it by heart. Let’s hear it for Met Opera taking more calculated risks like this!

– Lei & Lui

Saturday, October 12, 2013

A Nose on the Run!


Shostakovich’s The Nose at the Met – October 8, 2013


All photo/image credits: Met

Lui: Originally written between 1835 and 1836, Nikolai Gogol's short story The Nose is an absurdist whodunit fantasia, part bureaucratic thriller, part social satire, set in the same St. Petersburg as Pushkin's 1833 Eugene Onegin. Scouring the streets of the imperial Russian capital in search of his missing nose, Gogol's noseless protagonist Kovalyov could very well have crossed paths with Pushkin's cast of aristocratic characters, if it weren't for their difference in class. For, Kovalyov is hyper-aware of the hierarchies of Petersburg society.


William Kentridge's signature 2010 Met production of Shostakovich's 1930 operatic adaptation moves the action of the story to the St. Petersburg of the Soviet futurists in the early twentieth century. His staging features a profusion of paroliberismo, animation and live action video projected onto mobile set pieces, scrims, screens and curtains. The stage at the Met is a whirling frenzy of activity for virtually all of the swift hour and forty-five minutes of the modernist composer's fleet-footed score.

Lei: The terrific music was definitely the main character for me. The Met orchestra sounded more alive and electrified than ever under Gergiev’s lead, rendering Shostakovich’s score a pure and super-kinetic delight. I was so taken with the orchestra that I would have been content just with the music and Kentridge’s dada-futurist animations. These projections worked very well with the musical tempo and served both as part of the set and as narrative tool. The sequences where the human-size nose goes out and about, engaging in all sort of activities (from running and ballet dancing to typing and horseback riding) were just hilarious and conveyed perfectly the absurdity of the plot.


Lui: I tend to feel the same way. I could watch Kentridge's imagination riff on this material for a long time. It is so incredibly pleasurable. Still, the man at the center of the show is collegiate assessor Kovalyov (but you can call him "Major"), who is dramatically aware that the mysterious and absurd loss of his nose will doom his much desired escalation of the social ladder. In his adventures with and without his olfactory organ, Kovalyov measures himself up to everyone he encounters. He constantly scrutinizes the buttons on their uniforms, their noses, even their whiskers. When it turns out that his nose is on the loose and has somehow sprouted legs of its own and become as big as a man with a higher title than his, Kovalyov is suddenly unsure of how to address his superior. Perplexed before his nose – now State Councilor! – the Major comically struggles to convince it to resize and go back to where it belongs, on Kovalyov's face.



Lei: This production chose to display the confrontation between Kovalyov and his Nose as an exchange between two men, with a wobbly shadow of a nose projected onto the wall behind the higher ranked character. Rather, this should have been a confrontation between a man and his absurd overgrown nose. To me, this directorial choice missed the point entirely, especially since the big papier-mâché nose was always so effective throughout the rest of the opera. This is after all one of the key moments in the story that brings Kovalyov's complex to the fore. In the context of his bureaucratic and social insecurities, if he's talking to his nose we want to see a big nose, not a little man who sounds gracious, all too soft spoken and elegant. Also, tenor Alexander Lewis was not a convincing Nose, since he sounded too delicately high-pitched to the point of almost coming across as melancholic. I found this rendering to be at complete odds with the Nose’s character – a snob and brisk State Councilor who does not want to have anything to do with the lower-ranked Kovalyov.

 

Lui: Once his nose slips through his clutches, our dutiful civil servant then humorously weighs his bureaucratic options for seeking assistance in his plight – whether to file an appeal with the Board of Discipline, where the Nose now works, to take an ad out in the local newspaper or turn to the police. We are immersed in the world of protocol and arcane hierarchies. It is a satire of the corrupt inefficiencies of the bureaucratic chain of command, and it's outrageously surreal.

Lei: The staging conveys very vividly the dwarfing of man by the bureaucratic and social machine. In all the interior scenes (such as the barber shop, Kovalyov's apartment and the newspaper office) the action takes place in shoebox-like sets that occupy only a very small portion of the stage. The rest of the space is filled with projections of magnified newspaper articles and fast clips bursting with of all sorts of social choral situations, from crowds marching to clerks typing and audiences watching phantom shows of their own, with a terrific set-within-the-set effect.

Lui: It's rare to find an opera that so fully represents the social sphere in all its dynamic, overlapping layers. Shostakovich's score is bristling with frenetic energy and Kentridge brought it all to life. He gives us the crowds in the square, in the cathedral, in the park, at the newspaper office and in the police headquarters. Even poor Kovalyov's modest apartment is seething with social life as it is where scenes unfold with everyone from his live-in lackey, to the police commissioner, to a doctor living in the building who bursts in to make a house call. There is no privacy for our poor civil servant.


Another scene that really worked for me was the duet between Kovalyov and the mother of his some time love interest. The Major blames her for the loss of his nose and accuses her of witchcraft. The mother disregards the absurdity of the nonsensical accusation and reiterates the offer of her daughter's hand in marriage, should he still be so inclined. They exchange correspondence and sing the contents of their respective letters, one superimposed directly onto the other. Rather than achieving communicative clarity, the effect is a confusing hodgepodge of two people talking at and over one another. It is a piece of virtuosic genius the solution the composer comes up with to represent the social economy of their epistolary-marital commerce. Rather than give us the direct courting of the love interest through a seductive aria or a lovey-dovey duet, Shostakovich gives us a pushy mediator and turns the pseudo-love story into yet another negotiation straight from the sphere of the social.

Lei: The opera has lot of Russian recitatif, which was often quite funny given the absurdity of the story and the wittiness of the libretto; also, the subtitles were projected onto the set, sometimes even as part of the animations, which made the business of following the Russian fun and easy. Even so, after a while all the talking got a bit tiresome and I just craved some melody.

When it came to real singing, baritone Paulo Szot did a good job as Major Kovalyov, sounding powerful enough and displaying the comic vein required of the role. I also liked the musicality of Sergey Skorokhodov as the Major’s servant Ivan, who provided a rare moment of palpable emotion when he cozied up with a balalaika singing a simple folk ditty, showing the musical eclecticism of the visionary breadth of this opera. Barbara Dever as Mme. Podtochina and Ying Fang as her daughter brought some (at least for me) much-needed female melody to the piece, it was a relief to hear some soprano trilling after the prevailing manly Russian declamations. I was not particularly impressed by the rest of the singers, who many times were just so dwarfed by the music that it was just hard to hear them.


Lui: As one of the most experimental stagings that I've seen at the Met, it made me nostalgic for the kinds of cutting-edge productions NYC Opera has brought is over the last couple of years. Seeing The Nose made more poignant the imminent loss of the institution that brought us, for example, that visionary Moses in Egypt last year that won't soon be forgotten. Along with Satyagraha, The Nose ranks up there with the most unique operatic spectacles that I have experienced at the Met.

Lei: I am not sure The Nose it’s my piece of operatic cake, however I enjoyed it as an entertaining absurd futurist piece. And I very much look forward to seeing more Kentridge-like productions around.